As we approach the November 4th election, it’s clear that Our Revolution is expanding its influence—not just on the City Council, but now within the School Committee races. Their campaign flyers speak volumes, most notably for who’s missing: candidates like John Intoppa and Nicole Branley, both of whom bring valuable experience and perspectives to the table.

But the most compelling candidate this cycle may be Lisa Kingsley. Her qualifications are exceptional. Kingsley brings a deep understanding of education policy—not just at the city level, but statewide. She’s fluent in the complexities of school finance, curriculum development, and the inner workings of the teachers union. Her campaign reflects the same clarity and vision she’s known for professionally. Ask yourself: how many current School Committee members possess that level of insight?

It’s no surprise that Our Revolution may be courting her. But if they do, who gets pushed aside to make room? And more importantly, will Kingsley align herself with a slate that has prioritized political branding over practical solutions? Regardless of affiliation, her leadership belongs on the School Committee—and voters will decide that on November 4th.

The High School Debate: Let’s Talk Numbers

Many candidates are calling for a complete rebuild of Medford High School. But before we leap into a $200+ million project, we need to ask: with what money?

Medford is no longer eligible for the same level of state funding it received in the 1970s. Consider Arlington’s recent experience:

• 🏫 Arlington High School Rebuild Cost: $290.4 million
• 💸 State Contribution: $84.7 million
• 🏠 Local Burden: $205.7 million funded through a debt exclusion override
• 📈 Tax Impact: Some Arlington homeowners saw increases of up to $2,000/year
• 🏡 Average Home Value in Arlington: ~$1.33 million
• 💰 Average Annual Property Tax: ~$17,450

Now compare that to Medford:

• 🏡 Average Single-Family Home Value: $910,000
• 💰 Current Annual Property Tax: ~$7,059

A similar override in Medford could more than double the average tax bill. And for what? Medford High was built to serve 4,000 students. Today, enrollment hovers just above 1,000. Should we rebuild a school at triple the capacity we need?

---

Fix First. Plan Smart.

Before we talk about construction, we need a comprehensive education plan. What’s our vision for Medford’s students? What programs will attract families and improve outcomes? Without a clear roadmap, rebuilding the high school is like building a house without blueprints.

Yes, we can dream big. But we must also think smart. Repairing and modernizing existing infrastructure is more fiscally responsible—especially while Medford works to stabilize its financial footing. Promising residents a new school without a funding strategy or educational plan is not leadership. It’s wishful thinking.

Let’s vote for candidates who understand the numbers, respect the process, and prioritize Medford’s long-term success over short-term headlines.